Severity Levels

SafeReq analyzes every job requisition and categorizes findings by severity. From Critical statutory violations to Informational guidance, each level tells you exactly what action to take.

What Are Severity Levels?

Severity Levels are SafeReq's classification system for compliance findings. Each finding is assigned a severity level that indicates the urgency and legal risk, helping you prioritize fixes and understand what must be addressed before posting.

Critical findings are statutory violations that require immediate fixes before posting. High findings should be fixed to avoid legal risk. Medium findings represent best practices you should consider. Low findings are minor quality improvements. Informational findings are FYI only with no action required.

Action-Oriented: Every severity level tells you exactly what to do–from "MUST FIX" to "FYI ONLY." No guessing, no confusion.

Critical

MUST FIX BEFORE POSTING

Statutory violations that create immediate legal risk. These findings violate California 2026 laws with active enforcement and penalties.

Legal Risk:

High - Active enforcement, penalties, PAGA exposure

Potential Consequences:

Fines, lawsuits, removal from job boards, regulatory scrutiny

Common Examples:

  • Missing salary range (SB 1162 violation)
  • Discriminatory language (FEHA violation)
  • Training repayment clauses (AB 692 violation)
  • Waiver of statutory rights (SB 294 violation)

High

SHOULD FIX BEFORE POSTING

Strong guidance violations that create elevated legal risk. These findings may violate established employment law or regulatory guidance.

Legal Risk:

Medium-High - Established law, potential enforcement

Potential Consequences:

Regulatory complaints, discrimination claims, reputational damage

Common Examples:

  • Unclear remote work policy
  • Missing key benefits disclosure
  • Vague accommodation language
  • Incomplete EEO statement

Medium

CONSIDER FIXING

Best practice violations that create moderate risk. These findings may confuse applicants or signal potential compliance issues.

Legal Risk:

Medium - Best practices, industry standards

Potential Consequences:

Applicant confusion, reduced candidate quality, minor complaints

Common Examples:

  • Unclear career progression
  • Vague job responsibilities
  • Ambiguous reporting structure
  • Missing accessibility information

Low

OPTIONAL - NICE TO FIX

Minor improvements that enhance clarity and professionalism. These findings are low-risk but address quality and readability.

Legal Risk:

Low - Quality and clarity improvements

Potential Consequences:

Minor impact on candidate perception

Common Examples:

  • Formatting inconsistencies
  • Minor typos or grammar issues
  • Repetitive language
  • Missing optional benefits details

Informational

FYI - NO ACTION REQUIRED

Informational guidance with no legal risk. These findings provide industry benchmarks, tips, or context for reference only.

Legal Risk:

None - Reference only

Potential Consequences:

No consequences, informational only

Common Examples:

  • Industry salary benchmarks
  • Market competitiveness insights
  • Best-in-class language examples
  • Emerging trends in job posting

Get Your First Compliance Analysis

Every SafeReq analysis categorizes findings by severity level, so you know exactly what to fix before posting your job requisition.